Dedicated to the Study and Appreciation
of the Movies and Personalities of the Golden Age of Hollywood
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Songs in the Light, Part 1
Barrios's thesis was a bold one in '95. Those early musicals, he said, weren't simply the clumsy relics that time and advancing technique had made so embarrassing to look at today. (This may be the worst film ever to win a Best Picture Oscar sneered the L.A. Times, belittling The Broadway Melody several generations after the fact.) On the contrary, Barrios contended -- and he proved his point beyond arguing -- that they're the precious record of an industry in turmoil, groping and struggling to invent a genre that had simply never existed before -- and which in time would be viewed as the jewel in the crown of Golden Age Hollywood. And doing it all, moreover, not behind locked doors in secret trial-and-error experiments, but "in nearly full view of a vast, enthusiastic, and finally exasperated mass audience." What is worth remembering about those early talkie-singie-dancies isn't how primitive, naive and maladroit they look to us now, but how they electrified audiences at the time, and how much they still seem to get right -- even if serendipity deserves the credit as often as deliberate intent.
So did sound usher in musicals, or did musicals usher in sound? Chicken, egg. I don't know; I guess you could argue either side of that one. The point is, I didn't even think to frame the question before A Song in the Dark came along. That's what makes it one of the indispensible books: it was a paradigm-shifter in 1995, and it still is. Once you've read it, you simply can't look at those 1927-34 musicals the same way again. I'm grateful to Barrios for giving me a firm context for The Broadway Melody and saving me from making a public comment that's as ... well, let's say "as lacking in nuance" ... as the one quoted above from the L.A. Times.
Reading the second edition of ASITD, I get the distinct impression that it's a substantially different book from the first one. (Alas, I lent out my first edition in 2004 and never got it back, so I can't readily compare them side by side.) It's an odd feeling, revisiting a book I remembered as just about perfect, and finding it distinctly different -- yet, still, just about perfect.
Otherwise, pickings could be pretty slim. Take the case of Rouben Mamoulian's masterpiece Love Me Tonight. "Let it be stated plainly:" Barrios said, then and now, "Love Me Tonight is a wonderful film, one of the two or three greatest musicals ever made." Hooray and amen! No joke and no exaggeration. But if you
wanted to see it in 1995, you'd better have a collector friend who owned a print, or a connection at one of the big film archives. Fortunately for me, I had the former, so I knew whereof Barrios spoke. By 2001, I had managed to get my hands on a decent 16mm reduction print of my own. Then, two years later, Kino Video made my print obsolete by (finally!) issuing a sparkling new DVD transfer. It was worth the wait, but for a movie as delightful, as flawless, and as historically important as Love Me Tonight, it's a pity we had to wait at all.
What with Turner Classic Movies, Netflix, the Warner Archive and the Universal Vault, I've been able to season my reading of Barrios's second edition by seeing movies I could only have dreamed of fifteen years ago: Chasing Rainbows, It's a Great Life, Flying High, Love in the Rough, So This Is College, Sunny, So Long Letty, Rio Rita (1929), Lord Byron of Broadway, On with the Show!, Sweet Kitty Bellairs. Even The Great Gabbo is waiting impatiently at the top of my Netflix queue. (Frankly, I'm rather dreading that one -- overtly obnoxious, Barrios says -- but hey, if I can take Golden Dawn I can take anything.) In fact, the seasoning goes both ways: reading about the movies enhances the experience of seeing them, while seeing them deepens my admiration for how well Barrios writes about them.
In Part 2, I'll talk about some of these movies.
Posted by Jim Lane at 8:35 AM
All textual content Copyright (c) date of posting by Jim Lane. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jim Lane and Jim Lane's Cinedrome with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
- ► 2014 (26)
- ► 2013 (19)
- ► 2012 (29)
- ► 2011 (26)
- Addio, Cinevent 42!
- Cinevent, Day 4
- Cinevent, Day 3
- Cinevent, Day 2
- Cinevent 42
- "A Genial Hack," Part 1
- "Here's a Job for You, Marcel," Part 3
- "Here's a Job for You, Marcel," Part 2
- "Here's a Job for You, Marcel," Part 1
- First Comes the Phone Call
- Songs in the Light, Part 3
- Songs in the Light, Part 2
- Songs in the Light, Part 1
- ▼ May 2010 (13)